In response, Zaobao hoped readers would see the June 9 editorial in its entirety, saying the piece analyses the problem from three different aspects, and tries to explain that the pandemic, the role of social media, and popular ideological trends from abroad have all exacerbated racial tensions.
It also noted the different interpretations of the concept in academic circles, saying: "One should not easily dismiss the critique of CRT by serious scholars as a 'far-right American perspective'."
"We strongly believe that when discussing the issue of race in Singapore, we should not be applying foreign ideas and concepts without adapting them to local conditions," Zaobao added.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/lianhe-zaobao-replies-to-open-letter-over-its-editorial-on-race
These learned folks should also consider expounding the Critical Race Theory to Foodpanda. ;)
Fucking academics, you can always count on them to churn out a bloated grandmother's tale instead of being short and succinct.
Fun fact: signatory #57 was previously criticized for pursuing Buddhist studies at Oxford University courtesy of taxpayer dollars.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/psc-defends-scholarship-recipients-choice-of-buddhist-studies-at-oxford
https://mothership.sg/2019/07/psc-scholar-buddhist-studies/
Zaobao sure makes PAP look good.
I kept thinking they were referring to this CRT.